In The High Court At Shah Alam
In The State Of Selangor Darul Ehsan
(Appeals And Special Powers Division)
Between
Tetap Tiara Sdn Bhd (Appellant)
And
Hatching Education Group Sdn Bhd (Respondent)
Table of Contents
This case is more than just about a disputed rental agreement; it’s a lesson on the importance of clear terms in contracts, the legal protections for both property owners and tenants, and how the law interprets agreements that come under dispute. Here is a breakdown:
1 Characters
- Characters: In this legal drama, we have two main parties: Tetap Tiara Sdn Bhd as the “Appellant” (the party that is appealing the court’s decision) and Hatching Education Sdn Bhd as the “Respondent” (the party responding to the appeal). Think of the Appellant like someone who’s saying, “I think the decision was wrong and I want another chance to prove my point,” while the Respondent is on the other side saying, “No, the decision was right.”
- Footnote: An Appellant is someone who appeals against a decision made in court, seeking a revision or reversal of that decision. A Respondent, on the other hand, is the party against whom the appeal is made, essentially defending the original decision.
2 Introduction
- Background: This legal drama unfolds between Tetap Tiara Sdn Bhd, a property developer, and Hatching Education Group Sdn Bhd, an educational company. At the heart of the dispute is a tenancy agreement that Hatching Education claims was based on a letter of offer that violated various building and street drainage regulations, rendering the agreement null and void. Hatching Education is seeking a refund for the rent paid, while Tetap Tiara counters with a demand for unpaid rent and damages.
3 Story
- The Narrative: Hatching Education rented premises from Tetap Tiara for a monthly sum of RM35,000, intending to operate a special needs education center. Issues arose when it was discovered renovations deviating from the original plan had been made without approval, preventing Hatching Education from obtaining necessary trade licenses. This led Hatching Education to terminate the agreement and seek a refund, while Tetap Tiara counterclaimed for alleged outstanding rent and other costs.
4 Conclusion
- Judicial Judgment and Reflections: The court ruled in favor of Hatching Education’s claim, finding the agreement void due to legal violations. However, it refuted the claim for a complete refund based on the principle that both parties benefited during the tenancy period. The court’s analysis emphasized the impossibility of validating a contract that contravenes law through mutual agreement and highlighted the responsibility of tenants to be aware of and act upon any deviations from legal standards in a timely manner.
- Technical Aspects of the Judgment:: The judgment intricately dissected the tenancy agreement, focusing on clauses that Hatching Education argued were breached by the illegal renovations. The court weighed these arguments against statutory requirements and precedents, ultimately determining that while the tenancy was rightfully terminated, the claim for a full refund was not entirely justified due to the benefits derived by the Respondent during the occupation period.
- This case underscores the critical importance of compliance with legal standards in tenancy agreements and the nuanced considerations courts must balance in rendering decisions on contractual disputes.
DISCLAIMER
The information provided in the blogs, articles, case laws and news postings on the VPC Alliance (Kajang) Sdn. Bhd. website is intended for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the content, we cannot guarantee that it is always up-to-date, complete, or error-free. The views and opinions expressed in these materials belong solely to the respective sources and do not necessarily reflect the views of VPC Alliance (Kajang) Sdn. Bhd. We do not accept any liability for any loss or damage incurred from the use of or reliance on the information provided. Readers are encouraged to verify the information independently and consult relevant professionals for specific advice or assistance.
